FDP Home Page / FDP Forum / Classifieds / FAQ's
/ Links / Cookbook
|
![]() |
|
The FDP is made possible by the following companies and individual members like
you.
Please use the links below to show them we value their
sponsorship.
|
* God bless America and our men and women in uniform * * Illegitimi non carborundum! * If you benefit and learn from the FDP and enjoy our site, please help support us and become a Contributing Member or make a Donation today! The FDP counts on YOU to help keep the site going with an annual contribution. It's quick and easy with PayPal. Please do it TODAY! Chris Greene, Host & Founder Registered Members: 64,000+ LOST YOUR PASSWORD? ......................................................................
IF YOU CANNOT LOG IN, RESET YOUR PASSWORD.
|
| For Sale/Wanted Classifieds | ||
|
FDP Jam Calendar | Find
musicians in your area! |
|
| Search the Forums |
FDP Forum / Fender Custom Shop / If a nitro finish sounds better, why do so many expensive gutars use a urethane finish?
(This message was last edited by stratlester at 06:25 AM, Oct 26th, 2010)
(This message was last edited by littleuch at 06:30 PM, Nov 1st, 2010)
(This message was last edited by Figaro at 07:58 PM, Nov 1st, 2010)
(This message was last edited by Figaro at 05:21 PM, Nov 2nd, 2010)
(This message was last edited by Mike Eldred - Fender at 06:02 PM, Nov 2nd, 2010)
FDP Forum / Fender Custom Shop / If a nitro finish sounds better, why do so many expensive gutars use a urethane finish?
Next 20 Messages
Newest 20 Messages
Figaro
Contributing Member
*
South Carolina
I kicked cancer's ass!Oct 25th, 2010 08:46 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
It seems like everyone says that nitro finishes sound better. Then why do so many expensive strats and teles come with urethane finishes?
Does the type of finish really make that much of a difference in the sound?
stratcowboy
Contributing Member
*****
USA/Taos, NMOct 25th, 2010 10:24 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
Some will most certainly say yes. I'm not one of them. Too many other factors go into making a guitar sound good/great.
stratlester
australia
Shut up and play yer guitar some more!Oct 26th, 2010 06:22 AM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
The decision to use it is more to do with economics and safety. Poly is more durable and easier to work, it isn't as hazardous as nitro.
Nitro will check very easily. That wasn't a big deal in the 50s but today its considered to be a defect in the product. Builders have had some complainst from customers about that in the past.
Figaro
Contributing Member
*
South Carolina
I kicked cancer's ass!Oct 26th, 2010 03:17 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
So a guitar with a nitro finish will sound about the same with a urethane finish?
stratcowboy
Contributing Member
*****
USA/Taos, NMOct 26th, 2010 04:56 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
That would be an interesting experiment. But straight outta the blocks, it becomes "who knows?"
DPH
Contributing Member
*
Massachusetts, USAOct 29th, 2010 09:21 AM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
So,
1. Nitro is more hazardous to workers/environment.
2. Checks easier.
3. More difficult and expensive to apply.
Is there any advantage, and if so, what?
Danny Nader
usaOct 29th, 2010 09:47 AM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
So,
4. And doesn't provide a good barrier against water / moisture.
5. And a thick, gloppy finish of any type is not good!
A properly applied, relatively thin finish, will have negligible effect on the sound of the instrument. If it's cured properly and hard, it will allow as much of the wood to contribute as possible. When the wood is a contributing factor.
As has been endlessly debated, more factors go into the sound of any instrument than the composition of the finish and associated sealers.
Danny
Mike Eldred - Fender
USAOct 29th, 2010 08:05 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
I'm confused.
define: "better"
ME
Achase4u
Contributing Member
***
U.S. - VirginiaOct 29th, 2010 08:36 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
I have to disagree that nitro is somehow more dangerous. At least to the degree people talk about it. If your wearing a mask and spray in a proper booth, neither are going to get to you. Nitro came from paper/cellulose - sure its got thinners and stuff in it, but urethane is dangerous too. I never liked breathing either of them. Urethane isnt safe to breathe in.
An advantage to nitro is that it melts previous layers which can make it easier to apply. Poly wont melt previous layers. Just my opinion from my experience.
Now, if you want to talk cure times, sure nitro takes a while...
Voodoo Blues
MississippiOct 30th, 2010 07:15 AM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
People who think nitro sounds better then poly are just plain wrong and are simply repeating what some other internet hero claimed. My '78 Strat had a poly finish and I had it refinished in nitro by the Mark Jenner. It sounded just as good before as it does now.
rfrakes331K
USA
RonHalen Jokingly He SaysOct 30th, 2010 05:59 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
+1 No Diff! FAS!
littleuch
Contributing Member
********
MichiganNov 1st, 2010 06:29 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
"I'm confused.
define: "better""
From Fender's description about the Hwy 1.
"The thin nitrocellulose lacquer finish lets the body wood's natural tone shine through, making for one of the most exciting new instruments in the Fender family!"
I can see the notion of "better" being implied.
Figaro
Contributing Member
*
South Carolina
I kicked cancer's ass!Nov 1st, 2010 07:57 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
Exactly littleuch. Fender seems to promote nitro as better. They use nitro on some of their custom shop and many high end guitars. Some models even have a thin nitro finish such as the Eric Johnson model, and guitar players know how picky he is about tone. Also, vintage Fenders from the 50s and 60s came with nitro finishes and many people say they sound the best.
All this gives the impression that nitro is better, or at least sounds better.
I'm just trying to understand the reasons for a nitro finish, and if it really affects the tone of a solid body guitar? Or is the difference just the durability?
So if "The thin nitrocellulose lacquer finish lets the body wood's natural tone shine through", what does urethane do for the tone?
Voodoo Blues
MississippiNov 2nd, 2010 05:58 AM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
Of course Fender is going to imply nitro is better, it's a selling point.
Of all the elements that come together to produce a guitars sound, from strings to pickups to effects to amp to speaker and the million other things... the finish probably has the least affect on tone.
Mike Eldred - Fender
USANov 2nd, 2010 10:46 AM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
This is the FCS thread. I don't know about Highway 1 stuff. That blurb didn't say "better". It actually echos what consumers feel.
You guys seem smart. Why and what would make nitro "better"?
If Fender wanted to promote that as a "selling point", then why am I asking you?
ME
ECS-3
Contributing Member
*****
USA / VirginiaNov 2nd, 2010 12:31 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
A nitro finish smells better, for sure. But I don't know how it would make an instrument sound better.
labeau
Keweenaw, MINov 2nd, 2010 12:42 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
People think nitro is better simply because all of the vintage guitars were finished in it.
Since anything vintage is better than anything we could make now, of course it would impart a magical ability for a dead piece of wood (used in a solidbody electric guitar) to 'shine' through like a freakin' lucky charms rainbow. That could never be possible with silly urethane based finishes.
littleuch
Contributing Member
********
MichiganNov 2nd, 2010 03:16 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
I think a nitro finish has a more elegant appearance than poly. I think it ages nicely with the instrument and also has a certain tactile aspect that differs from poly. All my favorite guitars had a nitro finish. I claim nothing scientific to the above. There is all kinds of voodoo guitar players subscribe to and its all about what makes you happy. It would be interesting to scope out a guitar with a before and after test with a poly vs nitro finish with identical setups. I'd suspect the differences in tone would be negligible.
Figaro
Contributing Member
*
South Carolina
I kicked cancer's ass!Nov 2nd, 2010 05:13 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
Mike Eldred,
I guess "better" was the wrong word to use. But guitar players have been told that nitro finishes sound better, let the wood "breathe", etc... ever since guitar companies stopped using it and switched to polyurethane.
We are always trying to learn more about about guitars, and what makes them sound the way they do. Surely, from your years in the Custom Shop you know how anal some players can be about the details. One way for players to learn is to ask luthiers like you who have many years of experience with the wood, pickups, finish, etc... that makes a guitar sound the way it does.
I know the Hwy 1 is not a FCS model. But when Fender makes a statement in the description of a nito finish guitar "The thin nitrocellulose lacquer finish lets the body wood's natural tone shine through", it gives customers the impression that a nitro finish sounds better.
You have been involved in making the best, most respected guitars in the world for many years. And I think if anyone knows finishes, you do.
So please, in your opinion, does the type of finish (nitro vs poly) make a difference in a guitars tone?
Mike Eldred - Fender
USANov 2nd, 2010 06:02 PM Edit Profile Print Topic Search
Topic
Yes, it does. But, is it "better"?
Beck, Clapton, Hendrix, Blackmore...all poly or urethane.
ME
Next 20 Messages
Newest 20 Messages
Moderators: Black Hole Gang Chris Greene EA6B Iron Man reverendrob
FDP, LLC Privacy Policy: Your real name, username, and email
are held in
confidence and not disclosed to any third parties, sold, or
used for
anything other than FDP Forum registration unless you specifically
authorize disclosure.
Copyright © 1999-2013
Fender Discussion Page, LLC All Rights Reserved